Freethought Nation

I hate to say, but you are right. They also hate themselves too. I've seen it three too many times. At least my mother is still alive and hasn't done herself in like the other two did over religion. Depression, psychosis, and religious ideology are a really nightmerish combination. Thing is, I'm not allowed within my family, to even suggest my grandfather committed suicide, much less due to mental illness and religion. I don't dare say my oldest step cousin killed himself in part due to religious dogma and guilt. Thing is, what I tell others about what happened it's very true. Believing in heaven, that those in the psychiatry field are out to steal souls, and that doctors are keeping one alive longer than God wanted, is a receipe for suicide and was for my grandfather. He refused psychological treatment, stopped taking his heart medication and even said the above things. Three days later, he died. When he was not under a depressive psychosis, he was a smart man and knew better than to stop taking heart meds, but the religious psychosis got him and similarly it almost took my mother twice. Luckily, the doctors were able to save her and she's still alive, now surprisingly taking medication for her depression due to the suicide attempts (with religious psychosis).

Imposing religious guilt and telling them that if they just turn their life over to Jesus their excrusiating and debilitating back pain will disappear is also and was a receipe for suicide for my step cousin. He shot himself in the head and not even his brother could stop him. All because of physical and debilitating pain that would not go away and religious guilt.

Sorry, but when mental illness and religion are mentioned in the same statement, I can't help but remember the family members I have lost because of religion. It's a real horror to see people with mental illness and religious delusions, esp with a belief in an afterlife.

Here's some more character assination by our "friend" and member here madthumbs. He's over at the David Icke forums bashing her at every opportunity he gets over there.

check post 107
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... post288003

I love how folks come here and PRETEND to be our friend and then go about spreading rumors and lies.

Well that sure was a big rumour and lie. Of course, he still hasn't even read her work, so he doesn't know squat.

Campbell hit on this in the "Power of Myth" interviews: "People are dying all over the place because of metaphors". Their telling people to give their lives over to "Jesus", which obviously amounts to giving one's life over to the "Sun" during the "Age of Pisces".

What in the hell does that mean?

What good is it going to do anyone to give their life over to the Sun while it's in the house of Pisces? That sure as hell isn't going to heal anyone or make anyone better.

More than just Christians need to see the light. Muslims do too.

All literalizing religious fundamentalist's everywhere.

Our so-called "friend" madthumbs is at it again. He comes here to take quotes from Acharya to post them elsewhere, in this case the David Icke forums again. Now he's trying to suggest that Acharya is related to Rupert Murdoch. And still going on & on about "Acharya" not being her real name. I guess he's too lazy to give the F.A.Q. here at this forum a good going over as it addresses the juvenile complaints over her pen name.

post 114 - http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 12&page=12

Constructive criticism is often helpful but what these folks like madthumbs and drakul are doing is more like an obsessive-compulsive mental disorder.

----

It would be good to see someone post the new WWJ video in the WWJ thread - http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 404&page=2

And post something here in the companion guide thread too - http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18402

What I want to know is why, being that Acharya is woman, he just ASSUMES (which we all knows what that means) she's related to someone. Now this goes to show how smart this man really is. 1. Women start out with a "nee" (does he know what that word means?) 2. Many women in this day and age still change their names to their husband's names when they get married. In this respect there is no bloodline from her to other Murdocks. 3. She has a son, who probably got his daddy's last name when he was born. 4. She's divorced. 5. Therefore, she may have kept the name for her son or for whatever reason- to save confusion because of her son's name maybe, that reasoning happens often and is not a bad reason.

After my second divorce, I went back to my sons' last name, which was not my maiden name. The only tie I have to my sons' last name is that I had married their father and gave birth to my sons. I didn't want my maiden name, for personal reasons. The only bloodline is to my sons a totally different generation from the prior in which I got the name. No trace to the original orgin, except through my sons.

Bottomline, this man seems uneducated about women. What does this mean about the rest of his knowledge?

I do not deny that she may have gone back to her maiden name after her divorce, but this assumption he is making shows he is not thinking about anything nor does he know anything about Acharya. He has NOT done any background research on her to know anything. He just makes assumptions. In this case, a last name means nothing, UNLESS one really wants to go and ask HER about her name. He's not bothering to do that even, which is part of finding out about a person, which goes to show, he doesn't know how to do any research that will actually answers his questions. IF he really wanted to know the answer to that question, and was smart, he would go to Acharya, not make assumptions.

IF his audience is smart, they will see through this question and know that he knows NOTHING or he would not be asking them that question. He would be asking Acharya. As a friend of mine often says, "Stupid man!"

IF he drops in and sees this comment, and wants to challenge me on it, he better sign up HERE to ask questions and discuss it, because this is the ONLY place he's going to find out the truth to his STUPID assumptions and they are STUPID because he's not thinking his accusations through nor researching anything in the right way. Which goes to show, he's not only STUPID, but also IGNORANT. Therefore, allow me to make an assumption: Since he doesn't know how to research anything, this must mean he's not been to college, because that is where we learn how to do REAL research as well as learn how to THINK. Oh WAIT! If he learned how to THINK, that could turn him into an atheist.

BTW, I've never been married, so I've never been divorced.

It never ceases to amaze how SICK people can be on this planet. First of all, is there really something wrong with the quote that this individual is making much about? I don't care for cultures that abuse women. Wow - that's shocking!

Moreover, Rupert Murdoch spells his name differently. Certainly, Murdocks and Murdochs are members of the same Scottish clan, but going back far enough, according to the "Genetic Eve" theory, we are ALL related, so the entire argument simply idiotic.

Mriana, this individual was here on this forum, as a supporter. Apparently this person discovered that I don't hate Jews, so he's now on the warpath. What is sad is that allowing depraved people to post all over the place on David's forum certainly causes it to look very base.

David's mods need to clean up their act in allowing mentally ill people to ruin his forum. But, as we know, forums all over the place are populated by mentally ill people. Here we strive to maintain a sane refuge from dementia. Other forums apparently like to encourage it.

Another related video claiming Acharya and her masonic minions are out to get you! Looks like this guy wasted 6 weeks of his life!

Oh, well, you're probably better off.



See what happens when you go to the person? Being on a person's board and talking about them has it's advantages. Seriously though, he really should have gone to you, Acharya, before he started running off at the keyboard.



Either I missed him or didn't recognize him.

This guy REALLY needs an education. I didn't watch all of it, the beginning shouted that he needs to read the religious texts of Krishna, Buddha, etc and learn when they were REALLY written and it was BEFORE Jesus.

That was a very interesting video clip Vega.

What's funny is that I just recently picked up a copy of "The Secret Doctrine" by Blavatsky. I'm going to have to get through that thing now. I want to see what she actually wrote.

That was funny how they posted the old picture of Acharya to stress her "New Age Agenda".

To be quite honest, I thought the picture was pretty sexy myself. The only thing that I was thinking about when they flashed the photo was, "Damm, Acharya's one hot looking New Age chick".

See how just one guy going around forums spreading lies, gossip and rumors can snow ball? Now, there are a few videos floating around claiming Acharya is a Freemason and part of the Illuminati and luciferian network of Satan worshippers. All lies. I suppose I will have to organize something to address this in the F.A.Q. now. It seems to be what some folks WANT to believe though.

The following comes from the "About This Video" section under video creator and David Icke forum member user 'bigtimeweb' -

Exposing the creation of the character of Lucifer in the bible from an astrotheological reference to the "morning star" really puts a damper on this whole "Luciferian agenda".

Along with Revelation itself as being an astrotheological allegory. These guys are doomed. They're surrounded with astrotheology every which way they turn. There's no escaping it. And it's all because they haven't understood how the priests wrote these stories to begin with. This is really going to bite them all in the ass in the long run.